논문

Compact Optical Systems for Space Applications

Sergey Biryuchinskiy1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9889-2438, Siarhei Churayeu2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7668-4141, Yeuncheol Jeong3,*https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5775-4610
Author Information & Copyright
1Vigitek Inc., Darien, CT, 06820, USA
2Machine Vision Laboratory, Minsk 220112, Belarus
3Department of History, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea
*Corresponding author : Yeuncheol Jeong, Tel : +82-2-3408-3134, E-mail : yeuncheoljeong@sejong.ac.kr

  Copyright 2021 The Korean Space Science Society. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Mar 21, 2021; Accepted: Mar 25, 2021

Published Online: May 31, 2021

Abstract

Some optical schemes of lenses for spacecraft developed by the author are considered. The main optical characteristics of telescope lenses of various architectures are compared. We propose compact solutions of mirror, lens-mirror, and lens systems with maximum available angular resolutions and other parameters. Examples of calculating the optical systems of lenses used for various tasks both in the field of astronomy and in the field of remote sensing of the Earth and other planets are given. The example of onboard computer system is discussed. Practical recommendations on the development and use of telescope lenses are given.

Keywords: lens; telescope; satellite; aberrations; optical system; optimization; bandwidth

1. INTRODUCTION

The creation of optical systems with highest resolving power is one of the most important tasks of the space industry. The constructing of such optical systems significantly overlaps the ground-based technologies, which are very important for example in professional cinematography, especially in the field of calculation of optical systems, registration and image processing. There are various methods for calculating and optimizing the optical systems, including those suitable for space applications. The possible solutions were published by [13]. The recent discussions can be found in [47]. Here after we demonstrate the results for several optical systems. Note that few of them were first published by [8], the other are developed in this paper.

2. PROBLEM STATEMENT

Various system parameters such as dimensions, wavelength regions, mass, resolving power, relative aperture and photodetector parameters for a well-corrected optical system (without noticeable aberrations) are interconnected in a complex way. This is also due to the existence of various options for the developing of optical systems (suitable for overall limitations) that are approximately the same in basic characteristics. In practice, the requirements for dimensions, preferred focal length, and equivalent angular resolution are often given at the same time (angular resolution criteria may vary), which can lead to poorly resolved contradictions even for diffraction-limited optical systems.

The process of choosing the necessary features of optical systems for space ap-plications is inherently connected both with the choice of way of image detection (the method of its registration), as well as with the hardware and software component of its processing. Sometimes it is necessary to increase the resolution by the post-processing of the obtained image. Usually it is not allowed since the image received from the matrix photodetector is discrete and contains a fixed amount of information about the observation object and any manipulations with the provided amount of information at the output can only reduce it. This way can improve only the visual perception of received information, but the equivalent angular resolution cannot be increased without the postulates concerning the properties of imaged objects. Especially the amount of information obtained about the objects depends on the information throughput of the lens, the shooting conditions, the photodetector’s properties and on some other factors (for example, you can process several images of one object, which can lead to some limited increase in the amount of information received).

In some cases (for example, if the exact information about the observed object is a priori known), it is possible to use numerical-analytical methods to restore the information about object beyond the level obtained at the output of photodetector, of course with a certain degree of validity. However, these methods are very limited in practical applications. There are also various apodization methods, for example, the decrease of first dark Airy ring diameter, which theoretically can greatly increase the resolution, however, in practice, these methods are practically unsuitable for remote sensing of the Earth. Another method of increasing the resolution is the active interaction with the observed object (special external illumination, as, for example, in some microscopy methods), but these methods are complex, not universal and impossible for space objects.

The various options of digital image processing algorithms can improve the perception of some details of the obtained image, as well as the improvement of image quality by obtaining a lot of frames with different offset relative to the matrix (offset up to several pixels), the use of observations received at different angles, and also the photo-grammetric processing.

3. THE SELECTION OF OPTIMUM OPTICAL SCHEME CONSTRUCTION

Currently, there are various software packages for the calculation of optical systems. However, the use of such packages is not a sufficient condition for performing an applied task. The main necessary condition for constructing the optimal architecture of the optical system is the algorithm for predicting the properties of the system, the main of which is the bandwidth information [8], in advance of the calculation stage. At this stage the cost of the work can be estimated and the wrong result often leads to the impossibility of the project as a whole.

Another condition is the criterion for achieving the optimal calculation result, i.e. you need to know how much the result differs from the truly optimal for this technical task. It should be understood that an optimal optical scheme (the so-called global optimum) may not be a point result, but mathematically can be represented by some structure in a multidimensional space. In this case, it is possible to carry out the additional optimi-zation with new criteria, for example, in order to reduce the price or to facilitate the production process.

The next condition is the existence of algorithm to find the optimal solution. This condition not only restricts the mathematical methods for finding the minimum of the optimized function (implemented in all software packages), but also helps to define the optimized function, which should characterizes the entire optical system by a few numbers. It should be understood that a good software implementation of the numerical method for finding the minimum of the optimized function is not sufficient to achieve a global optimum. Therefore, the main difficulty is the lack of versatility of optical systems and the wide variety of technical parameters required. That is why an algorithm suitable, for example, for calculating the telephoto lenses may not be used for wide-angle ones.

Here after we made an overview of several solutions developed by the authors and the possible use of these solutions in space applications. A distinctive feature of optical systems for space-based lenses is the requirement to minimize mass and dimensions. This condition often leads to the creation of multi-purposed optical systems, combined in common housing. Such lenses can use the optical system architectures where the certain optical surface can be a refractive element for one group of wavelengths and a mirror element for another (i.e., combining optical systems with different ray paths into the framework of one optical architecture). Fig. 1 shows the architecture of the optical system of the combined three-channel lens of the transceiver. The main purpose of the system is the creation of a secure communication channel, including the channel between the spacecrafts.

jsta-1-1-104-g1
Fig. 1. The optical scheme of the combined system of the transceiver.
Download Original Figure

4. THE COMPACT OPTICAL SCHEMES

The process of selecting the lens architecture for space applications is associated not only with their functional application, but also with the requirements of necessary radiation resistance of the product. This requirement significantly limits the range of optical materials used. The strict weight and size limitations, as well as design requirements for dynamic loads and assembly adjustment features are necessary also. The combination of these factors often leads to significant differences with the architectures of ground-based optical systems.

Fig. 2 shows the optical system of two mirror lenses with a three-lens corrector and an aperture diameter of 700 mm. In the basic version the angular field of view is 1°, and the corresponding linear one is 85.5 mm. The relative aperture ratio of the telescope lens is 1:7. The angular field of view can be increased without changing the basic characteristics of mirror’s part of the system by adjusting the lens corrector only. The lens is designed to operate in a wide spectral range - from 0.4 to 3 microns, which allows user to solve a wide range of problems of the Earth’s remote sensing. Fig. 3(a) shows the graph of the polychromatic modulation transfer function (PMTF) of this system. It illustrates the high, diffraction-limited image quality for all wavelengths and across the entire field of view. The field curvature and distortion plots (Fig. 3b) show the high quality correction of the corresponding aberrations. As a rule it does not require for further improvements. If necessary, the distortion can be reduced by the order of magnitude, but a significant complication of the optical surface profiles will be required.

jsta-1-1-104-g2
Fig. 2. The optical scheme of two mirror system with a lens corrector and aperture diameter of 700 mm.
Download Original Figure
jsta-1-1-104-g3
Fig. 3. Graphs of the polychromatic modulation transfer function (a), field curvature and distortion (b) for the optical system in Fig. 2.
Download Original Figure

To create the small-sized lenses it is possible to construct the mirror-lens optical systems with refractive components comparable in diameter to the main aperture of the system. Taking into account the necessity of minimizing the total weight of the product, the number of such components should be as small as possible. The example is Fig. 4, where we demonstrate the compact high-aperture (1:2) mirror-lens system with an extended spectral range (0.4 – 3 μm) and a field of view of about 4 degrees. This optical system is made of one material and possesses not only diffractive image quality over the entire field, but also an ultralow value of distortion as it is shown in Fig. 5a, and chromatism (Fig. 5b). The relative apertures of similar lenses in Fig. 4 can reach 1:1, however, for systems with apertures of the order of 1:4 – 1:5, it is possible to find better solutions (depending on the special requirements, especially in terms of the angular field of view and spectral range).

jsta-1-1-104-g4
Fig. 4. Optical design of a high aperture (1:2) mirror-lens compact system with an extended spectral range.
Download Original Figure
jsta-1-1-104-g5
Fig. 5. Graphs of field curvature and distortion (a) and longitudinal chromatic aberration (b) for the system, shown in Fig. 4.
Download Original Figure

In some cases, in order to increase the resolution, the telescope lens may have several apertures. The example is shown in Fig. 6. The figure shows the compact system with an embedded ring aperture, which can be transformed by eliminating the non-used fractions of a given ray path. In the considered case with two apertures, the lens is actually an interferometer. It contains two entrance apertures and the mirror’s system. Due to multiple reflections it is quite compact in its class and provides an angular resolution of 0.3 angular seconds at 546 nm, with aperture diameters of 140 mm each. The figure does not show lens corrector and some auxiliary components to ensure multispectrality. The aperture ratio of such systems is usually near 1:15 and cannot be too high due to the construction difficulties and due to the availability of better solutions for higher aperture ratio systems.

jsta-1-1-104-g6
Fig. 6. Optical design of a dual-aperture high angular resolution mirror lens.
Download Original Figure

Let us discuss the systems designed not only for visible and near infrared wavelength range, but also for mid-infrared range (for example, 8 - 14 microns). Due to a significant restriction on the choice of optical materials used, the requirement of radiation resistance, as well as due to high requirements both in image quality and aperture ratio, the range of optimal solutions for lens architectures is significantly narrowed. Both lens, mirror-lens, and purely mirror systems can be used. The example of lens system with high aperture ratio is shown in Fig. 7. The diameter is 140 mm, the aperture ratio is 1:1.4, the field of view is 6° (linear field of view is 20.6 mm). The plots of the PMTF (Fig. 8a), field curvature and distortion (Fig. 8b), and longitudinal chromatic aberration (Fig. 8c) show not only the diffraction quality of the image over the entire field (Strehl ratio is over 0.9), but also an ultralow distortion. Note, that asperical surfaces are not used in this lens, and the distorsion is less than 0.025 percent.

jsta-1-1-104-g7
Fig. 7. Optical design of a high aperture (1:1.4) four-lens system for mid-infrared wavelength region.
Download Original Figure
jsta-1-1-104-g8
Fig. 8. Graphs of the polychromatic modulation transfer function (a), field curvature and distortion (b), longitudinal chromatic aberration (c) for the optical system shown in Fig. 7.
Download Original Figure

The next lens is shown in Fig. 9. The basic features of this system is similar to previous lens (Fig. 7), but of a different, compact mirror-lens design is used. It allowed the creation of more compact and low weight lens with even better aberration’s correction (see Fig. 10a, 10b). The Strehl number exceeds 0.99 over the entire field of view, the chromaticity is lower by two orders of magnitude. Nevertheless, the presence of a high (25% by area) central shielding should be taken into discussed. The comparison of Figs 8a and 10a allows the visual estimation of the influence of central shielding on the contrast of resulted image. So, for example, for a spatial frequency of 20 lines/mm, the lens, shown in Fig. 7, gives an image with a contrast twice as large as the mirror-lens lens of Fig. 9.

jsta-1-1-104-g9
Fig. 9. Optical design of a compact high aperture (1:1.4) mirror-lens system for mid-infrared wavelength region.
Download Original Figure
jsta-1-1-104-g10
Fig. 10. Graphs of the polychromatic modulation transfer function (a), longitudinal chromatic aberration (b) for the optical system in Fig. 9.
Download Original Figure

Note that the focal length and aperture ratio of these lenses are similar. However, the angular resolution of the second lens (Fig. 9) slightly exceeds the angular resolution of the first one (Fig. 7). Also, the distortion of mirror-lens system is significantly lower.

It is possible to construct compact optical systems which preserve the overall system architecture similar that of Fig. 2. Such systems are often needed in the visible and near ultraviolet range. The aperture ratios can be of the order of 1:10 or less. An example of such a system with an aperture diameter of 140 mm, spectral range from 0.4 to 2 or even 3 microns, and a aperture ratio of 1:10 is illustrated in Fig. 11. The angular field of view is 0.7°, it can be increased twice by modification of the lens corrector.

jsta-1-1-104-g11
Fig. 11. Optical design of two-mirror compact system with lens corrector and aperture diameter of 140 mm.
Download Original Figure

The size of this lens along the optical axe is only 90 mm, and in combination with a small-sized lens corrector, the total lens mass is negligible. Note that the reduction of lens size to 90 mm required the use of three-lens corrector with more complex configuration and the introduction of sixth-order aspherical surfaces (second-order aspherical surfaces were used in the previous scheme). Despite the complex ray path in the corrector, the chromatism of the system is small and does not affect the image quality (Fig. 12a). the distortion is also close to zero, as it is illustrated in Fig. 12b.

jsta-1-1-104-g12
Fig. 12. Graphs of longitudinal chromatic aberration (a), field curvature and distortion (b) of the lens in Fig. 11.
Download Original Figure

In some cases, when, for example, the requirements are the wide spectral range, the absence of spurious glare, and the operating under high radiation it is necessary to use of complex multi-mirror lenses, including the lenses with high values of aperture ratio and field of view. More complicated schemes usually require an integrated approach in optimization to satisfy all three of the above conditions. For this case of simple opti-mization methods used in various commercial programs are not sufficient.

That is why we developed a computer program designed for this special problem. For complex lenses, for example the lenses with variable focal length and wide-angle, such programs are compiled individually, due to the lack of universal requirements for image quality. The task is usually solved by a semi-analytical method. At the initial stage, various simplex methods (the methods without the use of derivatives) can be used to achieve a local optimum solution. The separation of different order aberrations is not done in the classical methods. Instead, the optimization function is defined so that the number of equations for its exact description is finite.

There is also no separation into axial and off-axis aberrations, since the solution of the problem only for axial aberrations is insufficient. This is especially true for systems where the uniform image quality across the entire field is required. The final part of calculations can be made with the use of usual commercial programs. Moreover, one of the criteria for the correctness of the obtained solution will be the similarity of results obtained by different programs (within the specified evaluation function) and by different optimization algorithms.

Fig. 13a and 13b show, respectively, the optical systems of high (1:2) and super high (1:1) aperture ratio four-mirror lenses developed by the author in 1987. Lenses with similar characteristics were presented for the first time [9]. In this case, the diameter of the aperture is 140 mm and the angular field of view is 2°. The central shielding of the system does not exceed 10% in area, which minimizes its negative contribution to image contrast. The scatter plots in Fig. 14a show a high and uniform diffraction limited image quality over the entire field. The lens is free of all monochromatic aberrations (the Strehl ratio at a wavelength of 546 nm exceeds 0.98 over the entire field), including distortion, the ultra-low value of which is less than 0.001 percent.

The scatter plots of Fig. 14a were calculated for the optical system of Fig. 13a with second-order surfaces only. If necessary (for example, to scale the system to a larger diameter or to increase the aperture ratio), it is possible to improve the image quality by introducing the higher-order aspherical surfaces.

jsta-1-1-104-g13
Fig. 13. The optical scheme of high aperture (1:2) (a) and super high aperture (1:1) (b) four-mirror systems with an increased field of view and diffraction image quality over the entire field.
Download Original Figure
jsta-1-1-104-g14
Fig. 14. The scatter diagrams of systems shown in Fig. 13.
Download Original Figure

So for example a similar to Fig. 13a, a four-mirror lens with a relative aperture of 1:1 has a central shielding of only about 10% of the area and also a similar ultra-low distortion value. The image quality is also much better, as it is illustrated by the scatter plot in Fig. 14b. The presented four-mirror telescope lenses, can be developed to correct all monochromatic aberrations. As a result these systems can be easily recalculated to significantly higher input aperture values, say to the scales of 1 meter or more.

To reduce the optical system weight and production cost, it is possible to reduce the diameters of the last two mirrors several times, which is extremely desirable for the practical use of such lenses with an input aperture diameter of 300 mm or more. Such an architecture of the optical system is also advantageous for constructing the combined multispectral optical systems with high degree of compactness, low weight, and resis-tance to high accelerations.

All the results presented in this paper are not intended to predict the development of any architecture of the optical system depending on the initial data, although this possibility partially exists. Any changes in the initial data for calculating the optical systems can change not only the basic architecture of the output systems (the number of lenses, mirrors, their location, etc.), but also affect even the possibility of creating the acceptable solutions in the frames of required dimensions.

5. THE ARCHITECTURE OF ON-BOARD COMPUTER SYSTEM

The above set of classes of space optical systems (SOS), operating in standalone mode, gives special requirements to the architecture of the on-board computer system (OBCS) used to solve various problems. Fig. 15 showed one of possible architectures of OBCS as a good example. Also, OBCS can be used for the needs of astronavigation, commu-nication, spacecraft control and other needs, beside tasks of image recognition, data processing and matrix control. The optimal computational architecture is the most critical parameter of OBSC to provide fixed-time response of the whole system without unpredictable delays and interruptions.

jsta-1-1-104-g15
Fig. 15. The architecture of the onboard computer system.
Download Original Figure

The OBSC architecture depends on the optical scheme of the telescope and classes of computational tasks. As a rule, OBSC architecture uses field-programmable gate array (FPGA) and special high-performance microprocessors. FPGA allows execution of primary real-time image processing tasks that require high speed information pro-cessing (for example, 2D–3D Fourier or Wavelet transforms). At the same time the OBSC microprocessors (MCU) used in more complex tasks, such as heuristic algorithms with high computational complexities, where post processing or time-critical computation executed by using FPGA parts which then will be used as an input of MCU.

FPGA ability to dynamically reconfiguration for the short time makes it strictly desirable to compare with the classical architecture with MCU only. In adaptive filtering tasks, the system response time is important, which makes such a scheme a good alternative to classical architectures. In systems where the cost, power, performance and reliability are critical such systems are good alternatives to classical architectures. Using two port synchronous memory is more preferable than error correction techniques for dram memories.

Design and manufacture of radiation-resistant computing devices requires a special approach and technologies, as well as special protection of operating equipment. As a rule, the set of concrete solutions against radiation can be determined depending on such parameters as the type of orbit, distance from the Earth, the probability of uptime and other parameters affecting the spacecraft operation, what is not a trivial task.

All calculations were carried out using the method and software, which was developed by one of the authors, as well as the Zemax OpticStudio 17 – 19.8 Premium program.

6. CONCLUSION

The schemes considered in this paper belong to the category of optimal optical systems (the ideal solution for the discussed problem) and cannot be improved without deterioration of other characteristics. This allows (according to the author’s method) to calculate the lenses with significantly different characteristics. Only a few lenses with the most interesting optical system architectures were considered here before.

It is technically possible to build systems with a higher resolution and similar dimensions (with not circular input aperture, including asymmetric apertures). However, they can be more complex (for example, the weight limit may be violated) and the describing of these question is beyond the scope of this work. Further development of space-based lens systems is possible only in combination with the development of technologies for production of high-quality light-weight optical components, as well as registration systems and image processing hardware.

References

1.

Beaulieu J, Gagn’e C, Parizeau M, Lens system design and re-engineering with evolutionary algorithms, Proceedings of GECCO 2002, New York, 9-13 Jul 2002.

2.

Milton L, Lens Design, 4th ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2006).

3.

Nagata Y, The lens design using the CMA-ES algorithm, in Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Seattle, WA, 26-30 Jun 2004.

4.

Ho J, Juhee L, Youngju K, Sanghyuk K, Optical design of a reflecting telescope for CubeSat. J. Opt. Soc. Korea. 17, 533-537 (2013).

5.

Kingslake R, Johnson RB, Lens Design Fundamentals (Academic Press, Boston, 2010).

6.

Rachim E, Tahir AM, Herawan A, Preliminary of optical lens design for micro-satellite, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 54, 012095 (2017).

7.

van Turnhout M, van Grol P, Bociort F, Urbach HP, Obtaining new local minima in lens design by constructing saddle points, Opt. Express. 23, 6679-6691 (2015).

8.

Biryuchinskiy S, Modeling and optimization of optical systems architecture for a modern cinema (2021) [Internet], viewed 2021 Feb 15, available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24251928

9.

Biryuchinskiy S, Optical systems of space lenses (2021) [Internet], viewed 2021 Feb 15, available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35288931

Author Information

Sergey Biryuchinskiysbiruchinsky@optica4d.com

jsta-1-1-104-i1

Sergey Biryuchinskiy received the Ph.D. degree in Quantum Electronics from Saint Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, Russia. He has expertise in Laser and Optical Telecommunications (RF and optics devices, antenna design, tunable metamaterials design), Professional cinema optics, Artificial intelligence, Biomedical optics and devices, Technology of invention process, Invention problem solving, Cryptographic devices and algorithms. He has worked with various international customers (more than 50 patents and patent applications); as a R&D adviser at Vigitek Inc. (USA) and Samsung-Electromechanics (South Korea), and as a Chief Technical Officer at Opto-mechanical Systems Limited (Russian Federation).

Siarhei Churayeuserg_vhdl@yahoo.com

jsta-1-1-104-i2

Siarhei Churayeu received the Ph.D. degree in Electronics and Computer Engineering from Saint Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, Russia. He has expertise in ASIC / GPU / FPGA / FPAA / IC / CMOS design. He has worked as an engineer, researcher and adviser in the electronic and semiconductor industry in the USA (CA, AMD), South Korea (Dongbu Hi-Tek), Russia, China and Belarus.

Yeuncheol Jeongyeuncheoljeong@sejong.ac.kr

jsta-1-1-104-i3

Yeuncheol Jeong received his Ph.D.s in Astronomy from UCLA, in Science Studies from Korea Univ., and in Philosophy from University of South Carolina. His research interests include Stellar Astrophysics, History and Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Physics. He is an Assistant Professor in the Department of History at Sejong University, Seoul, Korea.